Re: [PATCH 01/10] pack-write.c: plug a leak in stage_tmp_packfiles()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 06:30:05AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 04:54:15PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote:
>
> > The function `stage_tmp_packfiles()` generates a filename to use for
> > staging the contents of what will become the pack's ".mtimes" file.
> >
> > The name is generated in `write_mtimes_file()` and the result is
> > returned back to `stage_tmp_packfiles()` which uses it to rename the
> > temporary file into place via `rename_tmp_packfiles()`.
> >
> > `write_mtimes_file()` returns a `const char *`, indicating that callers
> > are not expected to free its result (similar to, e.g., `oid_to_hex()`).
> > But callers are expected to free its result, so this return type is
> > incorrect.
>
> Makes sense. I do think in the long run that it might make sense for all
> of these pack-write tmpfiles to tempfile.[ch] (either directly, or via
> register_tempfile() after creating the file). And then it would be safe
> to pass around the tempfile struct itself, which contains the filename,
> without worrying so much about ownership issues.
>
> But that's a much bigger change that shouldn't be part of your series.

Agreed on both fronts. I'll put investigating something like this on my
list of things to-do.

Thanks,
Taylor



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux