Junio C Hamano wrote: > Samuel Ferencik <sferencik@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >>>> Let's introduce a new condition: `os:<uname-s>` where `<uname-s>` is the > >>>> system name, i.e. the output of `uname -s`. > > > > The discussion about https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1429 seems to > > have stalled on several points. I'll try to summarise; let's see if we can move > > forward. > > > > (I am the reporter of https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/4125, which > > led to this PR. I am vested in making progress here.) > > > > 1. name of the setting (`os` vs `uname-s` vs `sysname`) > > I do not think it is a good idea to squat on too generic a name like > 'os', especially when there are multiple layers people will care > about. But I think the original thread discussed this to death, and > I do not see a point bringing it up again as the first bullet point. "platform" is the term I've seen to be less OS-centric. -- Felipe Contreras
