On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:22:48PM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> diff --git a/builtin/pack-objects.c b/builtin/pack-objects.c
> index fdf3f440be..522eb4dd31 100644
> --- a/builtin/pack-objects.c
> +++ b/builtin/pack-objects.c
> @@ -3366,11 +3366,9 @@ static void read_packs_list_from_stdin(void)
> for (p = get_all_packs(the_repository); p; p = p->next) {
> const char *pack_name = pack_basename(p);
>
> - item = string_list_lookup(&include_packs, pack_name);
> - if (!item)
> - item = string_list_lookup(&exclude_packs, pack_name);
> -
> - if (item)
> + if ((item = string_list_lookup(&include_packs, pack_name)))
> + item->util = p;
> + if ((item = string_list_lookup(&exclude_packs, pack_name)))
> item->util = p;
Oof. I was hoping that we could avoid having to look through both
lists. But that relies on us having disjoint sets of packs in the
include and exclude lists.
We probably *could* just ban this combination outright, but that would
also involve some work to try and detect that case. So I think that
doing this (and ensuring that the resulting pack is empty, that is that
the exclude set takes precedence here) is the right thing to do.
This (and the elided test below) look great to me.
Thanks,
Taylor
