Junio C Hamano, Apr 12, 2023 at 22:37: > You are the user who just ran format-patch to prepare sending out > the patches, and you are checking your patches. Wouldn't you have > the blobs already anyways? But these will be new blobs since we are applying the patches from files into another detached branch. > I'd rather not to see anybody go in that direction. "set -e" is a > poor substitute for a properly designed error handling. Between > > set -e > command A > command B > command C > > and > > command A && > command B && > command C || die message > > the former can only say "command B" failed because command B was run > under some condition that it did not like, but that is too low level > an error that is close to the implementation. As opposed to the > latter that can talk about what it _means_ that any one of these > three commands did not succeed in the end-user's terms. Ok.
