On 2023-04-07 22:01, Carlo Arenas wrote:
Not sure I follow the whole logic here, but PCRE2[3] (search for "general category" which is what the "gc" above stands for) only supports the abbreviated form of the unicode classes and `Nd` is indeed the one that corresponds to `Decimal_Number`.
That's fine: all that UTS#18[1] requires is that PCRE2 provide syntax for a regular expression that matches the Decimal Number class. Which PCRE2 does, via \p{Nd}.
The logic is that UTF#18 does not require that \d must behave like \p{Nd}, or even that \p{gc=Decimal_Number} must behave like \p{Nd}. It merely requires that there be some syntax for matching Decimal Number, and it says the choice of syntax is up to the implementer. This is why UTF#18 doesn't require that \d must also match non-ASCII digits (which is what I think Yves was saying).
[1]: https://unicode.org/reports/tr18/
