Re: Negative patterns in cone mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> I'm facing an issue with negative patterns in cone mode.
> I can't tell from the docs or git code if I misunderstand the
> usage, am trying something not supported, or if there is a
> bug.

My understanding so far, and I would appreciate if someone can
correct me if I'm wrong, is that the point of cone mode is that there
can't be negative patterns, and everything is a positive rule, so
the match search can stop as soon as a positive rule is found.

My understanding has been that it was designed with the use
case in mind of large mono-repos made of several independent
applications, of which a given developer only needs a few. For
instance, if I am an iOS developer, I will configure my sparse
checkout to have the back-end code and the iOS code, but not
the front-end code and the Android code.

I don't know if that's accurate because I'm not as well-versed
about it as I should be, so I would appreciate if someone could
correct my understanding. It is the chief reason we are
sticking with non-cone mode with our massive monolith at
Salesforce: it is not a mono-repo of independent applications,
but one massive monolith of which only a few (very large) files
are not needed for all devs.

Thanks in advance for anyone who may have insights.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux