Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > At any rate, I don't think any of that needs to hold up this patch, > which is not touching the asciidoctor side at all (I only wondered while > reviewing it what the implications might be). Yeah, sounds good. Wondering about and discussing possible implications is also a good thing, when done in a productive way. Queued. Trickling in modernization a bit by bit to avoid hogging too much list bandwidth may also be a good thing to do. Thanks.
