On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 09:22:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Sounds like the proposed log message can use a bit more polishing to > help future readers of "git log", then. But I think it is not > required to be explicit about us leaving the asciidoctor side > untouched to keep it working (in other words, we do not talk about > things that we are not doing in our log message, unless it is so > unnatural not to do them at the same time to warrant such an > explanation). Yes, I think the "is it unnatural" is a debatable point here. I'm OK with the commit message as-is. > Will queue with your Reviewed-by: in the morning. Sounds good, thanks. -Peff
