On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:38:59PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Yup. Your patches were a big improvement. But I'm now sitting here > > wondering if we shouldn't just allow a progress meter to overwrite > > the prior one. Then you only see the current task and progress, > > or the final output if we have nothing further to say about that. > > And then you've lost some diagnostic clue (the absolute numbers) about > the actual number of objects that were listed for "deltification" for > example. > > And imagine that you see the progress moving slowly because the remote > server is a NSLU2, but it says 80%. Then you go for a coffee and the > progress says 20% when you return because it now has moved to a > different phase. Rather counter intuitive. Obligatory me too: I totally agree with Nicolas here. -Peff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
