Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > As before, I think the first patch is the most important, and the rest > are optimizations. But with Eric's patch to chainlint.pl in the middle, > I think the argument for patch 4 (previously patch 3) is much stronger. > > Patch 5 remains mostly a cleanup, with no performance improvement. IMHO > the result is easier to follow, but I'm open to arguments to the > contrary. > > [1/5]: tests: run internal chain-linter under "make test" > [2/5]: tests: replace chainlint subshell with a function > [3/5]: tests: diagnose unclosed here-doc in chainlint.pl > [4/5]: tests: drop here-doc check from internal chain-linter > [5/5]: tests: skip test_eval_ in internal chain-lint The new step [3/5] makes it easier to justify [4/5], indeed. Two primary changes at the beginning are good as before. The last one does not make anything particularly easier to read, replacing one cryptic eval stuff with another, but it does not make it any worse, and the most importantly, it is clear to see that it does not change the behaviour. Will queue. Thanks. Let's merge it down to 'next'.
