RE: [PATCH] docs: document caveats of rev-list's object-name output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > Those names are really just intended as hints for pack-objects. I
> > > suspect the documentation could be more clear about these limitations.
> >
> > That would indeed be great and would have likely prevented the obvious
> > misconceptions on my side.
>
> Here's what I came up with.

Thanks, this is one half of what I would have needed to read.

> I also considered adding a specific "if you want the names of each file
> in a range of commits, pipe to diff-tree" example. But it seemed like it
> would clutter up this section. It might be OK as a stand-alone in the
> EXAMPLES section, but should probably be done as a separate patch if
> anyone is interested.

That would be the other half. Since e.g. GitHub's own "best practice" examples
do not use this pattern [0], I would assume that I'm not the only one who
didn't know about it.

[0] https://github.com/github/platform-samples/blob/master/pre-receive-hooks/block_file_extensions.sh




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux