Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 11:53:11AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > ... >> > But I don't have any idea how to do that with hardware usb eToken in my case. >> >> OK, so where does this put us, with respect to the change? ... > I would be OK taking the patches without any further tests. It is not > really making anything worse in the sense that we already do not test > any of the client-cert stuff. Alright. I think the patch has already been queued for some time, and it is OK to merge it down to 'next'. > If we can cheaply add some tests that at least exercise the code and > hand off to curl, that is better than nothing, I guess. > > I think the ideal would be a new t5565 that sets LIB_HTTPD_SSL > unconditionally and actually tests various client-cert formats and > requests using a made-on-the-fly cert. Thanks.
