Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> But I think this paragraph still does a bad job of justifying this
> direction with reference to existing code.
I thought it read reasonably well, if not perfect, and do not think
I am capable of rewriting it better, unfortunately.
Care to suggest a better rewrite?
> struct config_options {
> unsigned int respect_includes : 1;
> + unsigned int ignore_system : 1;
> + unsigned int ignore_global : 1;
> unsigned int ignore_repo : 1;
> + unsigned int ignore_local : 1;
> unsigned int ignore_worktree : 1;
> unsigned int ignore_cmdline : 1;
> unsigned int system_gently : 1;
That does look (I am not sure about _local bit, though) well
organized, but I suspect that it can be left for a follow-on
clean-up series, perhaps?
Thanks.
