Re: [PATCH 0/7] unused argc/argv/prefix parameters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] unused argc/argv/prefix parameters
From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:17:18 -0400
In-reply-to: <20230328205253.GA1753925@coredump.intra.peff.net>
References: <20230328205253.GA1753925@coredump.intra.peff.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0

On 3/28/2023 4:52 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> More from my -Wunused-parameter silencing. The first one actually fixes
> a bug. The second is a cleanup, and the rest are just UNUSED annotations
> (but grouped into similar cases).

This was easy to read and LGTM.

Thanks,
-Stolee

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] unused argc/argv/prefix parameters
  - From: Junio C Hamano

References:
- [PATCH 0/7] unused argc/argv/prefix parameters
  - From: Jeff King

Prev by Date: Re: [GSOC] [PROPOSAL v1] Draft of proposal for "Unify ref-filter formats with other pretty formats"
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] notes.c: introduce '--separator=<paragraph-break>' option
Previous by thread: [PATCH 7/7] parse-options: drop parse_opt_unknown_cb()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] unused argc/argv/prefix parameters
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux