Re: [PATCH 3/4] tests: drop here-doc check from internal chain-linter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:46:37PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:

> > Yes, it would look something like that and you chose the correct spot
> > to detect the problem, but to get a "pretty" error message properly
> > positioned in the input, we need to capture the input stream position
> > of the here-doc tag itself in scan_heredoc_tag(). It doesn't look too
> > difficult, and I even started writing a bit of code to do it, but I'm
> > not sure how soon I can get around to finishing the implementation.
> 
> The attached patch seems to do the job. Apologies for Gmail messing up
> the whitespace. It's also attached to the email.

Thanks! I was going to say "please don't consider this urgent", but I
see that my nerd-snipe was successful. ;)

> This would probably make a good preparatory patch to your [3/4]. As
> mentioned earlier in the thread, the changes to scan_heredoc_tag ()
> capture the input-stream position of the here-doc tag itself, which is
> necessary since it would be too late to do so by the time the error is
> detected by swallow_heredocs(). I don't now when I'll get time to send
> this as a proper patch, so feel free to write a commit message and
> incorporate it into your series if you want to use it. And, of course,
> you have my sign-off already in the patch. It should be easy to add a
> test, as well, in t/chainlint, perhaps as
> unclosed-here-doc.{text,expect}.

Thanks, I can take it from here (and I agree doing it as prep for 3/4 is
good, as I can then omit a bunch of explanations there). Here are the
tests I'll squash in (along with your $indent fix):

diff --git a/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc-indent.expect b/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc-indent.expect
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6e17bb66336
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc-indent.expect
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+command_which_is_run &&
+cat >expect <<-\EOF ?!HERE?! &&
+we forget to end the here-doc
+command_which_is_gobbled
diff --git a/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc-indent.test b/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc-indent.test
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5c841a9dfd4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc-indent.test
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+command_which_is_run &&
+cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+we forget to end the here-doc
+command_which_is_gobbled
diff --git a/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc.expect b/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc.expect
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c53b6b794a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc.expect
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+command_which_is_run &&
+cat >expect <<\EOF ?!HERE?! &&
+	we try to end the here-doc below,
+	but the indentation throws us off
+	since the operator is not "<<-".
+	EOF
+command_which_is_gobbled
diff --git a/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc.test b/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc.test
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..69d3786c348
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc.test
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+command_which_is_run &&
+cat >expect <<\EOF &&
+	we try to end the here-doc below,
+	but the indentation throws us off
+	since the operator is not "<<-".
+	EOF
+command_which_is_gobbled

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux