Re: [PATCH] fsmonitor: handle differences between Windows named pipe functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Eric,

On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget wrote:

> From: Eric DeCosta <edecosta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> CreateNamedPipeW is perfectly happy accepting pipe names with seemingly
> embedded escape charcters (e.g. \b), WaitNamedPipeW is not and incorrectly
> returns ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND when clearly a named pipe, succesfully created
> with CreateNamedPipeW, exists.
>
> For example, this network path is problemmatic:
> \\batfs-sb29-cifs\vmgr\sbs29\my_git_repo
>
> In order to work around this issue, rather than using the path to the
> worktree directly as the name of the pipe, instead use the hash of the
> worktree path.

This is a rather large deviation from the other platforms, and it has an
unwanted side effect: Git for Windows' installer currently enumerates the
named pipes to figure out which FSMonitor instances need to be stopped
before upgrading. It has to do that because it would otherwise be unable
to overwrite the Git executable. And it needs to know the paths [*1*] so
that it can stop the FSMonitors gracefully (as opposed to terminating them
and risk interrupting them while they serve a reply to a Git client).

A much less intrusive change (that would not break Git for Windows'
installer) would be to replace backslashes by forward slashes in the path.

Please do that instead.

Ciao,
Johannes

Footnote *1*: If you think that the Git for Windows installer could simply
enumerate the process IDs of the FSMonitor instances and then look for
their working directories: That is not a viable option. Not only does the
Windows-based FSMonitor specifically switch to the parent directory (to
avoid blocking the removal of a Git directory merely by running the
process in said directory), even worse: there is no officially-sanctioned
way to query a running process' current working directory (the only way I
know of involves injecting a remote thread! Which will of course risk
being labeled as malware by current anti-malware solutions).




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux