On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 04:06:39AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 3:58 AM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 02:54:45AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote: > > > I am unable to reproduce any linting errors when running this script > > > through chainlint, which is why I was more than a little confused by > > > this patch when I read it, and I was just about to ask for more > > > information, such as the actual error message. > > > > It's not your chain-lint script, but rather the builtin one that sticks > > "(exit 117) &&" in front of the snippet and evals it. So it creates the > > exact "foo && bar &" situation by prepending a line to the snippet. > > Thanks for clarifying that. I failed to infer that from the commit message. To be fair, I didn't figure it out from the commit either. It's just that running it stand-alone was the first thing I happened to try. ;) > Yes, I can reproduce it now. My mistake was that I tested 'seen' > rather than 1f2e05f0b79, not realizing that Junio had already applied > Michael's patch. (I meant to check if it had been applied, but forgot > to do so.) Oof. I got lucky twice, then, because I did run "seen" but I hadn't fetched recently enough. -Peff
