Steven Grimm wrote: > some of his specific arguments > about DVCS are on the bogus side. "Centralized systems encourage code > reviews," for one -- I heard this from the core Subversion team too. The hypothesis is that by forcing groups to be unable to proceed without continually rebasing to each other's work, that collaboration is enhanced. I think any argument which states that a restrictive system is better than a non-restrictive system, when the non-restrictive system can be used in the same way as the restrictive system (either with configuration, or agreement with the committers) is quite bizarre. Sam. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
