Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: >> So, I dunno. The result of applying this patch leaves it in an >> in-between state, where the division of labor between the caller and >> the callee smells somewhat iffy. >> >> Thanks. > > I totally agree with you here. From my point of view this "division of > labor" is getting fixed in the final patch that then also moves the > printing logic into `format_display()`. Yes, again I smell the same "isn't this series going a bit too roundabout route to its goal?" which I expressed in my response to an earlier step. The endgame of the series, even though I may not agree with it 100%, is self consistent and does not leave the "this ends at an in-between state" aftertaste in my mouth. Thanks.
