Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> My point is that the story with -c, or --cc is roughly the same, and >> that you yourself fixed --cc once upon a time to imply -p, so it's >> especially confusing for me that you are now in opposition to similar >> change to "-m". > > I think we all saw a good explanation for that already in the > thread. > > The mistake by "--cc" was fixed relatively quickly, but it is now > way too late to change the behaviour of "-m" without hurting > existing users. I think I've wasted enough time on this in this > thread already, so let's stop comparing --cc and -m now. That's fine with me. I already agreed long ago that to be on the safe side we shouldn't simply change -m nowadays, and addressed that concern by putting -m behavior change under configuration option in the current series. So what's the reason of rejection? Thanks, -- Sergey
