Re: [PATCH] fetch: pass --no-write-fetch-head to subprocesses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 10:04:38AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:

> It seems a user would expect this option would work regardless
> of whether it's fetching from a single remote or many.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  I haven't checked if there's other suitable options which could
>  go into add_options_to_argv(); hopefully someone else can check :>

There's at least one that came up before:

  https://lore.kernel.org/git/DM5PR1701MB1724CCBB1AC5CF342BA9ADD5898E9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

but it never got turned into a real patch.

This is obviously an error-prone mechanism.  It would be nice if there
was a way to avoid it, but after some discussion in this thread, we
didn't come up with anything clever:

  https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200914121906.GD4705@pflmari/

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux