Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > What I have yet to determine is that 'git for-each-ref' does > not have significant overhead due to how it's implementation is > built around listing "all refs that match" versus an explicit > input list of refs. There's also the concept of '--stdin' that > would be interesting to interact with. Yeah, we could add --no-sort to allow streaming better and --stdin to feed list of refs to work on, if the end-user facing interface based on --format is what people find reasonable. > I'll continue to investigate this path and report back when I > have more of this information. This is as far I as I could get > today. Thanks. It is a very interesting experiment.
