Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > So would it be worth it to just revert 8ef1abe550, and always store the > meta-files? That's one less option to support, and one less surprise > when some other feature is built around them. > > Or is there some reason that we really want to have a mode where nothing > is written into t/? From reading 8ef1abe550 it sounded like this was > mostly a hygiene / optimization thing, and not some special mode we > cared about supporting. Interesting thought. It would simplify our lives to have fewer conditionally-moving parts. >> t/test-lib.sh | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > The patch itself looks correct, if we want to go with a --counts option. Yes.
