Re: [PATCH v9 2/6] submodule: rename strbuf variable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 4:25 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Calvin Wan <calvinwan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > A prepatory change for a future patch that moves the status parsing
> > logic to a separate function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Calvin Wan <calvinwan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  submodule.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/6] submodule: rename strbuf variable
>
> What strbuf variable renamed to what?
>
> I have a feeling that squashing this and 3/6 into a single patch,
> and pass buf.buf and buf.len to the new helper function without
> introducing an intermediate variables in the caller, would make the
> resulting code easier to follow.
>
> In any case, nice factoring out of a useful helper function.
>

A much earlier version squashed those changes together, but it was
recommended to split those changes up; I think I am indifferent either way
since the refactoring is clear to me whether it is split up or not.
https://lore.kernel.org/git/221012.868rllo545.gmgdl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux