Re: [PATCH 0/7] Bisect dunno

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> Could we, _please_, first decide if the implementation has merits, and 
> just apply it as is in that case?  We can rename it whatever anybody likes 
> later, and we can paint the bikeshed brown if you want to.

I thought everybody really agreed that being able to skip commits that you 
cannot say good/bad about is a feature worth doing?

Right now we actually have some docs in the man-page about doing that 
avoidance manually, so it's not like it's debatable whether this issue 
comes up. It most definitely does come up.

Does anybody really think it's not a good feature? And I've not seen 
negative comments about the implementation either apart from some small 
details that I think got fixed up already (but maybe the complaints were 
all hidden by the shed color discussions ;)

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux