Re: [PATCH v2] signature-format.txt: note SSH and X.509 signature delimiters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023-02-10 11:52:42+0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 10 2023, Gwyneth Morgan wrote:
> 
> > This document only explained PGP signatures, but Git now supports X.509
> > and SSH signatures.
> 
> To elaborate a bit, in 1e7adb97566 (gpg-interface: introduce new
> signature format "x509" using gpgsm, 2018-07-17) we added X.509, and in
> 29b315778e9 (ssh signing: add ssh key format and signing code,
> 2021-09-10) we added "ssh", but our docs were never updated.
> 
> Your commit message says as much in briefer terms, but maybe if you
> re-roll having those references would help put this change in context.>

I'll reference those commits in v3.

> > +Signatures begin with an ASCII Armor header line and end with a tail line,
> > +which differ depending on signature type.
> 
> Does the "ASCII Armor header" really add something here, or just confuse
> the user with a reference that's not followed-up or explained here?
> Maybe we should point out OpenPGP's '--armor' option in passing, to note
> to the reader that this isn't some git-specific concept.

I think having a relevant term to search for online and in manpages is
helpful. Mentioning the specific command-line option seems unnecessary,
but I'll put the term "ASCII Armor" in quotes to make it clearer that
this is not a git-specific concept.

> I wonder if structuring it like this wouldn't help make this easier to
> read, and reduce the repetition, as well as making the circular
> references between this & 'gpg.format' more obvious:
> 
> 	The signature start and end marker comes on its own line, and
> 	differs based on the signature type (as selected by
> 	'gpg.format', see linkgit:git-config[1]).
> 
>         Those are, for values of 'gpg.format':
> 
>         gpg: `-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----` and `-----END PGP
>              SIGNATURE-----`. Or, if GPG has been asked to produce
>              RFC1991 signatures: `-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----` and
>              `-----END PGP MESSAGE-----`
> 
>         x509: `-----BEGIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----` `-----END SIGNED MESSAGE-----`
> 	ssh:`-----BEGIN SSH SIGNATURE-----` and `-----END SSH SIGNATURE-----`

Looks good. I'll do this in v3. I'll reference these by the gpg.format
value, as well as a parenthetical proper name, like "gpg (PGP)"; these
are basically the same the other two formats, but I want it to be clear
that `gpg` signatures don't have to be from the gpg program but could be
from any PGP-supporting program.

> Then for gpg.format in Documentation/config/gpg.txt we could add e.g.:
> 
> 	See linkgit:gitformat-signature[5] for the signature format,
> 	which differs based on the selected 'gpg.format'.

OK.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux