ZheNing Hu <adlternative@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > ... Therefore, generally speaking, it's better not to let users > create/update special one-level references. The question was "Is it that we are actively discouraging one-level refs like refs/stash, so removing is fine but once removed we do not allow creating or updating?" You could just have given a single word answer, Yes, then. > Certainly, I can remove the previous section as you requested. I didn't request to do anything to the change. I asked you to explain why you allow only delete without create/update, and without knowing why, I didn't have enough information to make such a request. I think "we discourage a single-level refnames so allow deleting one that may have been created by mistake, but do not allow creation or deletion as before" does make sense. As long as that is explained in the proposed log message and in the end-user facing documentation, I am happy with the new behaviour. Thanks.
