Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > My biggest concern with the patch I showed is that it gives no escape > hatch if people don't like the change. Yeah. > Like I said earlier, I don't > think anybody has grounds to complain about the byte-for-byte output > hash changing, as it would be changing once per second. But they may > complain about the cosmetic problem. Yeah, they may complain "it no longer is possible when I took the archive out of a tree". To be honest, I didn't think of that line of complaints before. > The more obvious one at the Git level is to have > "--current-mtime" or something to get the old behavior. But at that > point, you may as well support "--mtime=now", which is the same amount > of work, and much more flexible. Yup. Let's merge it down to 'next' then. Thanks.
