Re:[PATCH v3 1/1] trace.c, git.c: remove unnecessary parameter to trace_repo_setup()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/21/23 21:00, Junio C Hamano wrote:
 > Idriss Fekir <mcsm224@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
 >
 >> From: idriss fekir <mcsm224@xxxxxxxxx>
 >>
 >> trace_repo_setup() of trace.c is called with the argument 'prefix' from
 >> only one location, run_builtin of git.c, which sets 'prefix' to the
return
 >> value of setup_git_directory() or setup_git_directory_gently() (a
wrapper
 >> of the former).
 >
 > The former is the wrapper of the latter, though ;-)
Oh sorry about that, that's what i meant but wrote it in reverse.

 >
 >> Now that "prefix" is in startup_info there is no need for the parameter
 >> of trace_repo_setup() because setup_git_directory() sets
"startup_info->prefix"
 >> to the same value it returns. It would be less confusing to use "prefix"
 >> from startup_info instead of passing it as an argument.
 >
 > ... but for commands with neither RUN_SETUP|RUN_SETUP_GENTLY bits
 > requested, the prefix is set it to NULL by run_builtin(), and
 > setup_git_directory.  What value does startup_info->prefix get in
 > that case?  If we know it will always NULL (and I suspect that is
 > the case, but I haven't followed the codepaths myself to find it out
 > lately, so you should without taking my word blindly), saying that
 > at the same place you mentioned the return value of setup_git_*()
 > functions in the first paragraph would make the reasoning perfect.
 >
 > Otherwise, very nicely done.
 >
 > Thanks.
 >
I did check if startup_info->prefix is *always* set, that doesn't seem
to be the case, but for trace_repo_setup() this doesn't matter as it will
never be called if neither RUN_SETUP nor RUN_SETUP_GENTLY are set
("if (run_setup &&..."). I also think there is a typo in the comment after
that if-statement, it should be "/* set_git_dir().." instead of
"/* get_git_dir()...". I have a question, why isn't startup_info initialized
with default values in setup.c?


Thanks a lot for your valuable feedback.

PS: I'm so sorry if this email has been sent multiple times, i thought it wasn't at first.

Kind regards.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux