Hi,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Here is my bisect dunno patch series again.
> > The changes since last time are the following:
>
> I now have this series queued in my pu branch. It passes the tests
> it comes with, and doesn't appear to break anything, but apparently
> there is also still some debate about what a dunno should be called
> ("unknown", "void", "ugly", "dunno", "skip" ...).
AFAICT these are all bikeshed painting arguments, not technical arguments.
I was initially opposed to having --bisect-all, wanting to have
--bisect-dunno <ref>...
But in the end, the people doing the work decide, and therefore I am fine
with --bisect-all, especially since it seems clean enough for me.
As for all those "dunno is no English"... I'd first merge the technical
part (i.e. what you have now in pu), and then let the discussion about
which synonyms to choose continue, until a consensus is formed about other
names (if there is a consensus at all!).
IMHO there is no reason to hold of the fine work of Christian, just
because there are non-technical arguments still in the air.
I want bisect dunno. Even if there is another name later.
Ciao,
Dscho
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
