Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] shorten_unambiguous_ref(): avoid sscanf()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] shorten_unambiguous_ref(): avoid sscanf()
From: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 07:46:13 +0100
Cc: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>, 孟子易 <mengziyi540841@xxxxxxxxx>, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Y+5ohGA6NKNi6Di6@coredump.intra.peff.net>
References: <Y+z3MtgayoXsxaHA@coredump.intra.peff.net> <Y+z3RfhAxW/2iNYP@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20230216055641.brlx3os2ucj3ywer@tb-raspi4> <Y+5ohGA6NKNi6Di6@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Ui-outboundreport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:De8WWkIzBFc=;VYrF73OdCi7jMG2eyWau0LphtiT jsYhEEZe5TsL1+8S3PAGg8H3+tyzF7y3nEPEiwNSti7LIXe3FYq+RaPcXmcu+BJaAKXdPKS1i djkMh9iFz4+cLtTEJ9ibuV/DWrFZ7bV6KstL4zytawEKhnFI/TGyi21fYjlcdpOZsw+sJlDsr wH63HhvCGfef7lbA33CkQgjIpBOCXAlckRVnia4xo6QR7EOyXBzl/7ekl4Ib2PlLeHgT7qrSI h+KQ1GleJDnaGjgPT0jYmbLd5frJIv1SY0R34cIOadTVPSfD6mAZdSKNbz7JOqvKkVzeaLciY f586vTy3byDgTUnmbWXFZISWsZkM3SAiOznIEgS4lJX7/XLzoS26ABIYy6mk1rLNrTS7VDSEt k3p20/oqdGB9Vn7ABUA4pLseK4e/it4n18+cs+1UDak/ka0l5UILVwlMt8+GHjHoSpX+caomu HMNPJBMsUbYyFKyrsAsQQuOuY/SZ5a5jMPX5PTEJrO7b9BPhZzn7grXrDHO7sq2wGrrQg87Js LsFwSl7qVIgoQDi6Ujp9wVWH6/SEBkwsqd3UZVyKIzEcytBPxHt0Wny7Yl+ledfkmmhgmGY3l lXTeYu0axjRKDquXa0cZiKD0AYoywQuEVDTpOySoV+n7aXMv7i2PVkaSaXVo92pF6Kg7IQsLp dbHpUC67mJ4rzwjR7iFo0fvCP4NjZBrowHCuPKBR4SUjdFJZO5QsJUvRzYHLKM3Iy784bA+mx TUkNBGeWcxAeQM27RSZL25SduQKcgneWDMLogDwdhifHw9JcuO8D4Zl1hjNSUvIlc/YobTPYd aR54fuz66E7xcbqUKreOsEQyZRdF+sJ33cXuIX4Mz+lA1oUsp6VgpzlaPbB9g3Wln0XR/cTLs iwwVq98IKAvY8y9PHVu7jDFAvblZmj1yLtb7Qh77tI7QocqMK9dd8GZOx8MBXeuFCU4GRkK9I 90DF4UALuqOB4bmZAQ+fvvzkFo4=
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 12:31:48PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 06:56:41AM +0100, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:

[]
Thanks for the patience with my somewhat confusing emails-
I was to much confused by the fact that I couldn't reproduce the problem here.
In short: The bug is in good hands.

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/3] get rid of sscanf() when shortening refs
  - From: Jeff King
- [PATCH v2 3/3] shorten_unambiguous_ref(): avoid sscanf()
  - From: Jeff King
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] shorten_unambiguous_ref(): avoid sscanf()
  - From: Torsten Bögershausen
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] shorten_unambiguous_ref(): avoid sscanf()
  - From: Jeff King

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pull: conflict hint pull.rebase suggestion should offer "merges" vs "true"
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] branch: introduce --(no-)has-upstream and --(no-)gone options
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] shorten_unambiguous_ref(): avoid sscanf()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] get rid of sscanf() when shortening refs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]