Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] notes.c: cleanup for "designated init"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Teng Long <dyroneteng@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The "struct note_data d = { 0, 0, NULL, STRBUF_INIT };" style could be
> replaced with designated init format.
> ---

Missing sign-off.

The change itself with the explanation does make sense.

Thanks.

>  builtin/notes.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/notes.c b/builtin/notes.c
> index 23cb6f0d..553ae2bd 100644
> --- a/builtin/notes.c
> +++ b/builtin/notes.c
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static int add(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	struct notes_tree *t;
>  	struct object_id object, new_note;
>  	const struct object_id *note;
> -	struct note_data d = { 0, 0, NULL, STRBUF_INIT };
> +	struct note_data d = { .buf = STRBUF_INIT };
>  	struct option options[] = {
>  		OPT_CALLBACK_F('m', "message", &d, N_("message"),
>  			N_("note contents as a string"), PARSE_OPT_NONEG,
> @@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ static int append_edit(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	const struct object_id *note;
>  	char *logmsg;
>  	const char * const *usage;
> -	struct note_data d = { 0, 0, NULL, STRBUF_INIT };
> +	struct note_data d = { .buf = STRBUF_INIT };
>  	struct option options[] = {
>  		OPT_CALLBACK_F('m', "message", &d, N_("message"),
>  			N_("note contents as a string"), PARSE_OPT_NONEG,



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux