Teng Long <dyroneteng@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > The "struct note_data d = { 0, 0, NULL, STRBUF_INIT };" style could be > replaced with designated init format. > --- Missing sign-off. The change itself with the explanation does make sense. Thanks. > builtin/notes.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/builtin/notes.c b/builtin/notes.c > index 23cb6f0d..553ae2bd 100644 > --- a/builtin/notes.c > +++ b/builtin/notes.c > @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static int add(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > struct notes_tree *t; > struct object_id object, new_note; > const struct object_id *note; > - struct note_data d = { 0, 0, NULL, STRBUF_INIT }; > + struct note_data d = { .buf = STRBUF_INIT }; > struct option options[] = { > OPT_CALLBACK_F('m', "message", &d, N_("message"), > N_("note contents as a string"), PARSE_OPT_NONEG, > @@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ static int append_edit(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > const struct object_id *note; > char *logmsg; > const char * const *usage; > - struct note_data d = { 0, 0, NULL, STRBUF_INIT }; > + struct note_data d = { .buf = STRBUF_INIT }; > struct option options[] = { > OPT_CALLBACK_F('m', "message", &d, N_("message"), > N_("note contents as a string"), PARSE_OPT_NONEG,