René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> writes: >> Yes, that does make sense but it is orthogonal to what sane_ctype >> wants to address, I would think. > > Currently we can only use one or the other variant because our sane > versions use the same names as the locale-aware ones. Full overlap > instead of orthogonality. Ah, that is true but slightly complicated. As long as the caller of walks the string byte-by-byte and calls ispunct() in each iteration, I do not think any "locale aware ispunct()" do much good to us. Once callers are made locale aware, I am not sure they would still want to call the isfoo() functions that have been know to be very much byte-oriented. Thanks.
