Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > While it makes sense not to inherit stdin from the parent process to > avoid deadlocking, it's not necessary to completely ban stdin to > children. I do not think deadlock avoidance is an issue. Unpredictable feeding of pieces of input into multiple children is. One possible semantics is to grab the input and dup/tee into all the children, so that each child gets its own copy to process. A hook like "pre-receive", when it has more than one scripts listening to the event, may want such a semantics. Another possible semantics is to give priority among the children running simultaneously and feed only one child, while starving others. > An informed user should be able to configure stdin safely. By > setting `some_child.process.no_stdin=1` before calling `get_next_task()` > we provide a reasonable default behavior but enable users to set up > stdin streaming for themselves during the callback. I _think_ this alludes to the latter, e.g. "only one child is allowed, and the one that controls what children are spawned sets no_stdin for everybody but the chosen one". We may want to be a bit more explicit in the proposed log message and definitely in the documentation. The implementation is "nice". > + /* > + * By default, do not inherit stdin from the parent process - otherwise, > + * all children would share stdin! Users may overwrite this to provide > + * something to the child's stdin by having their 'get_next_task' > + * callback assign 0 to .no_stdin and an appropriate integer to .in. > + */ > + pp->children[i].process.no_stdin = 1; > + > code = opts->get_next_task(&pp->children[i].process, > opts->ungroup ? NULL : &pp->children[i].err, > opts->data, > @@ -1601,7 +1609,6 @@ static int pp_start_one(struct parallel_processes *pp, > pp->children[i].process.err = -1; > pp->children[i].process.stdout_to_stderr = 1; > } > - pp->children[i].process.no_stdin = 1; > > if (start_command(&pp->children[i].process)) { > if (opts->start_failure)