Re: [PATCH] read-cache: use size_t for {base,df}_name_compare()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 05 2023, René Scharfe wrote:

> Support names of any length in base_name_compare() and df_name_compare()
> by using size_t for their length parameters.  They pass the length on to
> memcmp(3), which also takes it as a size_t.

This looks good, and it's nice to see changes that slowly address the
greater topic of our outstanding -Werror=sign-compare issues.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux