On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 12:48 PM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 01:22:55PM -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > # Should it be archived as a static site? > > > > It's possible to turn git.wiki.kernel.org into a static site with a large > > header on every page that it contains historical archival information, with a > > link to https://git-scm.com/doc > > This would be my preference, just because some of the old content may > still have value. Some pages (like old gsoc stuff) would better redirect > to git.github.io, but it is probably not worth the time to even try to > classify pages. This would be my preference too. I agree that some old content might still have some value. We could also move or redirect some old content to git.github.io, but I am not sure it's worth the time either. > > # Should it be archived and put out of its misery? > > > > The last option is to just archive the site and put it out of its increasingly > > irrelevant existence. > > I'm also OK with this, though if it is not too much work to serve the > old content with a warning that it may be out-of-date, that seems > better. I agree. Thanks, Christian.
