Re: Stability of git-archive, breaking (?) the Github universe, and a possible solution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 31 2023, brian m. carlson wrote:

> Since then, I've been very opposed to us guaranteeing output format
> consistency without explicitly doing so.  I had sent some patches before
> that I don't think ever got picked up that documented this explicitly.
> I very much don't want people to come to rely on our behaviour unless we
> explicitly guarantee it.

FWIW I think the reason that didn't get picked up (I went back and read
the discussion) is that there was some feedback on the v1, [1] suggested
(at least to me) that you'd re-roll it, but that re-roll never seems to
have made it to the list.

1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/YD7aDwX%2FaiRN0GZs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux