Re: Stability of git-archive, breaking (?) the Github universe, and a possible solution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



February 1, 2023 4:40 AM, "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As people have come to rely on the exact "deflate"
> implementation "git archive" promises to invoke the system's
> "gzip" binary by default, under the assumption that its output
> is stable. If that's no longer the case you'll need to complain
> to whoever maintains your local "gzip".

Surely if reproducibility of .tar.gz files is the goal,"invoke
whatever arbitrary binary on $PATH happens to be called gzip" is an
poor solution.

It is only even possible to consider stabilizing gzip output as a
goal for Git (although this seems ill-advised for the reasons
Brian already discussed) in the post-2.38 world where git is
doing the gzipping.

If one has the requirement to substitute one's own specific
compressor, there is an option for that.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux