Re: [PATCH v3] grep: fall back to interpreter if JIT memory allocation fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] grep: fall back to interpreter if JIT memory allocation fails
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 13:05:13 -0800
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20230131185611.520311-1-minipli@grsecurity.net> (Mathias Krause's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2023 19:56:11 +0100")
References: <20230127154952.485913-1-minipli@grsecurity.net> <20230131185611.520311-1-minipli@grsecurity.net>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)

Mathias Krause <minipli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Mention the possibility to prefix a failing pattern with '(*NO_JIT)' in
> case we run into the JIT's limitations, as per Junio. Also clip the
> printed pattern to ensure the hint actually gets printed.

Looking good.  Will queue.  Thanks.

References:
- [PATCH v2] grep: fall back to interpreter if JIT memory allocation fails
  - From: Mathias Krause
- [PATCH v3] grep: fall back to interpreter if JIT memory allocation fails
  - From: Mathias Krause

Prev by Date: Re: Stability of git-archive, breaking (?) the Github universe, and a possible solution
Next by Date: [ANNOUNCE] Git Rev News edition 95
Previous by thread: [PATCH v3] grep: fall back to interpreter if JIT memory allocation fails
Next by thread: Add git config variable for signoff
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux