Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > first let me thank you for being the interim maintainer. I know it is > much work, and I frankly do not have the time, or nerve, to do it. Heh. In the past 24 hours I've really learned how much I appreciate the work that Junio does, and how infrequently I make it known that I'm happy he's doing it for us. Nothing like understanding what the guy goes through then to walk a day in his shoes. :-) > Out of > curiousity: did you use the scripts in "todo" to send these emails? Yes. Took me a few minutes to figure out which scripts did what magic. Junio likes two character script names, because uh, they are short to type. Then I hand modified the output to say git/spearce.git and appear from me, not Junio. But otherwise they are the same scripts available from his Meta repository (aka the todo branch). > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > > > * lt/diff-rename (Tue Oct 2 19:28:19 2007 -0700) 1 commit > > AFAIR this was ready to go to master, with a 5-10% speedup or so, just > needing a bit of testing. Which it should have gotten by now. OK. I'll look at it tomorrow and consider moving it. I recall the context of this discussion now that you mention it, and I've been running this in production use since Junio committed it to next so I'm certainly not seeing any downsides to having this patch in the tree. > > * kh/commit (Mon Sep 17 20:06:47 2007 -0400) 4 commits > > * js/stash-create (Mon Jul 9 00:51:23 2007 -0700) 2 commits Thanks for the summary on these two topics. They are going to stay parked in next for a while then. :-) -- Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
