On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 5:16 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
<avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Fix a leak that's been here since 7366096de9d (bundle API: change
> "flags" to be "extra_index_pack_args", 2021-09-05), if can't verify
> the bundle we didn't call child_process_clear() to clear the "args".
That's really hard to parse. Perhaps:
Fix a leak that's been here since 7366096de9d (bundle API: change
"flags" to be "extra_index_pack_args", 2021-09-05). If we can't verify
the bundle, we didn't call child_process_clear() to clear the "args".
> But rather than doing that let's verify the bundle before we start
> preparing the process we're going to spawn, if we get an error we
> don't need to push anything to the "args".
Also hard to parse. Perhaps:
But rather than adding an additional child_process_clear() call, let's
verify the bundle before we start
preparing the process we're going to spawn. If we fail to verify, we
don't need to push anything to the child_process "args".
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> bundle.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bundle.c b/bundle.c
> index 4ef7256aa11..9ebb10a8f72 100644
> --- a/bundle.c
> +++ b/bundle.c
> @@ -627,6 +627,10 @@ int unbundle(struct repository *r, struct bundle_header *header,
> enum verify_bundle_flags flags)
> {
> struct child_process ip = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> +
> + if (verify_bundle(r, header, flags))
> + return -1;
> +
> strvec_pushl(&ip.args, "index-pack", "--fix-thin", "--stdin", NULL);
>
> /* If there is a filter, then we need to create the promisor pack. */
> @@ -638,8 +642,6 @@ int unbundle(struct repository *r, struct bundle_header *header,
> strvec_clear(extra_index_pack_args);
> }
>
> - if (verify_bundle(r, header, flags))
> - return -1;
> ip.in = bundle_fd;
> ip.no_stdout = 1;
> ip.git_cmd = 1;
> --
> 2.39.0.1225.g30a3d88132d
