Rubén Justo <rjusto@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > -static void reject_rebase_or_bisect_branch(const char *target) > +static int ishead_and_reject_rebase_or_bisect_branch(const char *target) The original name was already horrible but it became much worse by acquiring a non-word "ishead" as part of it X-<. At least let's replace "rebase or bisect" with something a bit more generic, extensible, and shorter phrase. For example, isn't the point of having the function was to give us a mechansim to see if the branch with the given name is not to be modified because it is being worked on elsewhere? "The branch is in use" would be a good phrase to express such a concept, so die_if_branch_is_in_use() or something along that line may be easier to grok.
