Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: add --sparse-filter-oid argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13/01/2023 21.01, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

     Note that one of the tests only pass when run on top of commit
     5842710dc2 (dir: check for single file cone patterns, 2023-01-03), which
     was submitted separately and is currently is merged to 'next'.

Thanks for mentioning this. It's exactly the sort of information the
maintainer needs when applying your patch to his tree. And it can be
helpful for reviewers too.

Indeed it is.  Thanks for pointing it out---I just wish other
contributors see and follow such a wise piece of advice buried in
review of a patch by others.

Apropos where to apply the patch: This patch conflicts with the topic
'ls-tree.c: clean-up works'[1], which refactors parts of 'ls-tree.c'.
It has recently been merged to 'next' in [2].

Should I go ahead and rebase my changes on top of 'tl/ls-tree-code-clean-up'
and then resubmit a new patch, or does it make sure sense to wait?

1: https://public-inbox.org/git/20230112091135.20050-1-tenglong.tl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2: Commit f7238037fd (Merge branch 'tl/ls-tree-code-clean-up' into next, 2023-01-14)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux