On Tue, Jan 10 2023, Philip Oakley wrote: > On 10/01/2023 06:17, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: >> Make the ensure_full_index() function stricter, and have it only >> accept a non-NULL "struct index_state". This function (and this >> behavior) was added in [1]. >> >> The only reason it needed to be this lax was due to interaction with >> repo_index_has_changes(). See the addition of that code in . > > Missing reference. Should this be [2]? Yes, thanks. Will fix that in a re-roll (pending further comments, will wait a while).
