Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] ref-filter: add new "signature" atom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 1:53 AM Nsengiyumva Wilberforce
<nsengiyumvawilberforce@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt |  27 +++++++
>  ref-filter.c                       | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh            | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 244 insertions(+)
>
> Range-diff against v2:
> 1:  ce51d8e79e = 1:  ce51d8e79e ref-filter: add new "signature" atom

It's strange that it's saying nothing changed compared to v2. I guess
the v2 it's talking about is not actually the v2 you sent to the list,
right?

Anyway it's better if you can describe a bit with your own words in
the cover letter what changed, and sometimes even what didn't change,
since the previous version you sent.

For example, here you can say that you decided to actually remove the
test that checked the %(signature) format and explain a bit the reason
why you did that.

You can also send links in the cover letter to the branch(es) (on
GitHub, GitLab or other such platforms) that you used for this and
previous versions of the patch (or patch series). It can help people
try it and look at the changes on their own system.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux