Re: should git rev-parse -q --verify on a range produce output?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 04:51, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> demerphq <demerphq@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Is this something you think should be fixed? I would give it a go if
> > there was some direction on what it should do in this case. Just error
> > early and produce no output?
>
> I do not mind if the error case gets changed to behave differently,
> as long as the updated behaviour is something everybody thinks an
> improvement over the current behaviour.  I do not offhand know what
> the "fixed" behaviour should be.
>
> I do not mind if nothing changed and documentation gets updated to
> reduce end-user confusion, either.

Ok, I'll wait a bit to see if someone can suggest a good alternative
behavior, and if nobody does ill write a doc patch.

Cheers!
Yves

-- 
perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux