Re: [PATCH] date.c: allow ISO 8601 reduced precision times

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phil Hord <phil.hord@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Do you have any suggestions about how I can better alleviate your
> concerns?  I don't think there are real regressions here and I tried
> to explain why.

Other than "including it in a released version and waiting for
people to scream", I do not think there is.  The "next" branch was
meant to be a test ground for these new features by letting
volunteer users to use it in their everyday development, and the
hope was that we can catch regressions by cooking risky topics
longer than usual in there, but we haven't been very successful, I
have to say.

Thanks.  Let's queue it and see what happens.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux