RE: Is there any plan to support partial checkout or submoudule improvement?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> [please do not top post.  Only keep the parts of the original message that
> you are responding to, and put your answers just below.  It is a matter of
> simple economy: it takes you just a couple of minutes, but spares those
> "millions" of readers the minutes to understand what you're talking about.
> In addition, it is a matter of politeness.]

Thanks for the hint, and I have corrected this.

> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, franky wrote:
> 
> > I want a single "git-pull" to deploy a new version and a
> > single "git-reset" to back to versions before [on partial checkouts]
> 
> You are talking as if your partial checkout was a project in its own
> right.  Then make it so.  Do not use a partial checkout, but make that a
> submodule.

As I said in the first email, the submodule way suffers from the multiple
commit problem: src and bin as two submodules of project, three commits (for
the 3 dirs separately) are needed when src directory changes and compiled
binaries being put in bin directory. It's annoying to have to give 3 commit
logs.
 
franky
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux