hi, thanks for reading/thinking. > Sorry, but I do not see any "-" versions in the above. Simple and minimum reproduction recipe would be useful for the list to help. the - versions are identical. as i wrote, there are 2 - versions in addition. i didn't want to make a pointlessly long email. it would be great if i could provide a reproduction recipe. i don't know how i couold do that in this case. for example, when i try to pare down the repo and make private things obscured, i run into the proble that when i do staging, things change around, thus erasing that particular bug. and other stuff like my limited knowledge of git. i'm afraid i am stuck with hoping for other types of solutions like "i've seen this before" or "that's not possuble unless..."or something a priori like that. but if you have an idea of how to create a minimal repro in less than a week, let me know. On 12/31/22, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Samuel Wales <samologist@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> the problem that seems like data corruption is that a few lines appear >> twice as - and once as +. but in the current version of the files, >> those lines exist only once. here are the lines. there are 2 - >> versions and one + version: >> >> +***************** REF bigpart is a partition >> +biglike and homelike are distracting nonsense i think except >> +to describe inferior filesets. anomalous subset of home >> +might be called homelike or so. > > Sorry, but I do not see any "-" versions in the above. Simple and > minimum reproduction recipe would be useful for the list to help. > > https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html > > Thanks. > -- The Kafka Pandemic A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy: https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
