On 12/19/22 7:49 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I think these three patches were designed to be "oops, that was > wrong and here is a band-aid" follow-up fixes on top of what was > back then in 'next'. Now the base topic has been kicked out of > 'next' together with these, we can afford to roll them into the base > series before merging it back to 'next', but due to things generally > being slow toward the end of the year, that hasn't happened yet. I wasn't expecting to re-roll the base topic, but I'll get started on that now. However, the comments in this review are barely actionable. They provide very little value especially for how verbose they are. I'm frustrated to see such a drive-by review so late in the process. Thanks, -Stolee
